Community Forums Archive

Go Back

Subject:Acid and cakewalk
Posted by: jayhawk91
Date:6/7/2000 11:41:00 PM

I must admitt I've been suckered into the acid whril wind.
Here I thought I had a great program to use in my existing
system and help me do my music production. Instead I find
that I can't use acid pro 2.0 with one of the most popular
software based, digital multitracker and sequencing
softwares out there(Cakewalk pro audio 9). Had I know that
acid would not slave to all the other programs and
equipment I have. I would have never purchased it and so 600
$'s later I have a program that I can't use. I like how
very causually sonic foundry says Ohhhh and by the way it
doesn't slave to anything after the sale is complete.
Great!!! To me this is a tremendous oversight and a very
fundamental feature how could this have been left out??? I
don't know anyone who wants to willingly use a basic loop
program as their master and have to click back and fourth
to record music in there sequencer. What a mess!!! I am
extremly bitter about this. All before know I was a huge SF
advocate but this has all put a very bad taste in my mouth.

Subject:Re: Acid and cakewalk
Reply by: pwppch
Date:6/9/2000 9:51:00 PM

What do you mean it doesn't slave to anything? It slaves to MIDI Time
Code. This is all we ever advertised.

ACID cannot slave to MIDI Clock for a number of technical reasons.

(And before people start jumping on me, yes there is a problem with
accurate triggering/start on MTC slave.)

Cakewalk can't generate MTC. Cakewalk can slave to ACID either
through MTC or MIDI Clock. Slaving CW to ACID's MIDI Clock is ideal
because it permits CW to follow any tempo map or dynamic tempo
adjustments you make with ACID.


Peter


Brent Walker wrote:
>>I must admitt I've been suckered into the acid whril wind.
>>Here I thought I had a great program to use in my existing
>>system and help me do my music production. Instead I find
>>that I can't use acid pro 2.0 with one of the most popular
>>software based, digital multitracker and sequencing
>>softwares out there(Cakewalk pro audio 9). Had I know that
>>acid would not slave to all the other programs and
>>equipment I have. I would have never purchased it and so 600
>>$'s later I have a program that I can't use. I like how
>>very causually sonic foundry says Ohhhh and by the way it
>>doesn't slave to anything after the sale is complete.
>>Great!!! To me this is a tremendous oversight and a very
>>fundamental feature how could this have been left out??? I
>>don't know anyone who wants to willingly use a basic loop
>>program as their master and have to click back and fourth
>>to record music in there sequencer. What a mess!!! I am
>>extremly bitter about this. All before know I was a huge SF
>>advocate but this has all put a very bad taste in my mouth.

Go Back