I've had ACID and Vegas for around a decade now, and they are my primary two apps. I use ACID mostly for VSTi's, and for tracking guitars and arranging them. Then I use Vegas as my primary multitrack/mixing app.
My question is, has anyone else noticed any quality difference between recording into ACID and arranging then rendering, vs recording into Vegas and rendering? With all other things being equal of course.
I'm not sure if I can pick out any difference or not, but I wonder if anyone else can, or if anyone has done any kind of technical comparisons, null tests, etc...?
I normally record into ACID because it just feels more familiar and easier to track, do edits and punch-ins, compile and render. But if I can get any kind of quality increase from doing in Vegas to start with, I can get used to doing that.
Thanks.
My question is, has anyone else noticed any quality difference between recording into ACID and arranging then rendering, vs recording into Vegas and rendering? With all other things being equal of course.
I'm not sure if I can pick out any difference or not, but I wonder if anyone else can, or if anyone has done any kind of technical comparisons, null tests, etc...?
I normally record into ACID because it just feels more familiar and easier to track, do edits and punch-ins, compile and render. But if I can get any kind of quality increase from doing in Vegas to start with, I can get used to doing that.
Thanks.